Local sources from Germany: Berliner Morgenpost, MDR.
UK coverage: DW.
Germany’s spy agency, BfV, has classified the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as an extremist entity. The agency cited the party’s “xenophobic, anti-minority, Islamophobic” rhetoric as the main reason for the designation. This classification gives authorities greater powers to monitor the party, including intercepting phone calls and using undercover agents. The AfD has faced controversy in recent years, with senior officials making controversial statements about Germany’s Nazi era and proposing mass deportations. The party secured 20.8% of the votes in the last election and recent polls indicate it is gaining popularity.
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has classified the AfD as “securely right-wing extremist.” The party, which was founded in 2013 as a eurosceptic force, has gradually shifted further to the right in terms of its content. Initially focusing on economic policy issues, the AfD’s emphasis shifted to national and identity politics, particularly regarding immigration and national identity, following the refugee crisis in 2015. The party gained support by positioning itself as critical of migration and making Islamophobic and racist statements.
The AfD’s success in elections has been accompanied by internal divisions. The party’s national-conservative, immigration-critical elements, known as the “wing,” have clashed with more moderate factions. Despite these divisions, the AfD has managed to maintain a united front and draw strength from its right-wing populist and conservative positions. However, several former party leaders have left the AfD due to increasing radicalization.
The classification of the AfD as a right-wing extremist party has raised concerns about its impact on the democratic process. Critics argue that the party’s efforts are directed against the human dignity of certain groups and against the principle of democracy. While there have been calls for a ban on the AfD, opinions on such a procedure are divided, with some fearing that a ban would only strengthen the party.
The classification by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution grants authorities greater powers to monitor the AfD, including intercepting phone calls and using undercover agents. The agency’s report highlights the party’s disregard for human dignity and its opposition to democracy. It also points out that many AfD members hold the belief that only those born in Germany with German ancestry are true Germans, potentially leading to unequal rights for certain groups in the country.
The AfD’s classification as a right-wing extremist party has significant implications for Germany’s political landscape. As the second-largest party in parliament, the AfD’s rise in popularity and its extremist rhetoric pose challenges to the country’s democratic values and social cohesion. The ongoing debate surrounding the party’s classification and potential ban reflects the deep divisions within German society and the need for a robust response to far-right extremism.
